J'ai postulé via un établissement d'enseignement supérieur ou universitaire. J'ai passé un entretien chez Procter & Gamble (Columbus, OH)
Entretien
a ridiculous IQ test of sorts, questions become increasingly difficult. One portion made no sense with very little explanation. The final portion was a memory quiz. I don't see what this had to do with the IT internship as I don't believe I will be spending my days there memorizing dots on a white screen. There was also a behavioral aspect, that was fine.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
If you saw your friend stealing something from the Cafeteria, what would you do?
J'ai passé un entretien chez Procter & Gamble (Singapour)
Entretien
Long process: IQ test, personality test and then 3 rounds of interview. Essentially they care a lot about personality types in this company because they think it determines working style -- hence you have a lot of people who are type-A, outcome-driven.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Describe your hardest technical challenge and how did you solve it
J'ai postulé en ligne. J'ai passé un entretien chez Procter & Gamble (Bucarest, ) en mars 2026
Entretien
I took the online assessments. First, the behavioural and self-rating one (called the Peak assessment). I thought the questions were very strangely formulated (for example, asking how accurate or inaccurate it is that you're average at x thing compared to most people. If I think i'm better or if I think I'm worse, those would both make the sentence inaccurate, right? Such a strange and useless way to rate someone. Would make a little more sense if it said "at least average"). Then there was the attention games one. It is infamous for a reason. You can find information about these assessments on their website. By the way, there was a grammar mistake in one of the questions. I just really think HR should re-think or at least re-write this whole online assessment.