Completely unprofessional process that basically always a single bias opinion of ONE Workday interviewer of 8-9 interviewers to control the outcome. Where else does 1/8 equal a majority vote? Basically someone has the power in this situation to make a judgement for any reason (may not even be true) and is given power to control someone's fate of the interview. How can that be considered ethical or a professional process. Basically ONE person (who may have a personal problem with the candidate is given the power of the decison). If 1/8 people have an issue, I would say the issue is most likely 100% personal in that case. Even 2/8 would seem highly skewed.

First call with recruiter, 3 interviews and a mock steerco. They make it clear they cannot pay above the mid range, although they advertise the entire range. I was excluded from the interview process on pay grounds.