One can see that once there was an effort to have structure, but interviewers are obviously not trained, they arrive unprepared but have the highest expectations from you in terms of preparation (you will be given assignments at all stages). The process, on the paper, is straight forward, but in practice, you end up being interviewed by someone who does not even want to talk to you but rather wants to get it over with; I've been invited to a building when the interview was in a different one, then put in room to wait, and then moved to a different room again because the interviewer, who is also a director, did not feel like going up the stairs... all sorts of things like that... Expect some irrelevant tests, in a noisy lunch area, with no explanations on what they are and why you do it (still have not heard how I did...) The worst is the final round, where the interviewer is obviously repeating the same questions again and again as she does not seem natural at all, the conversation was very artificial though she claimed she wanted it to be a natural flow. Very disturbing that she asks personal questions; what is the purpose of it? Forget about any room for salary negotiation, I tried, they do not seem to understand that work is a competitive environment where people have different values; their vision is that it would not be fair to others to go beyond the bracket... never heard anything that stupid in an interview... How much they pay says a lot about how they value people and about the reality of the job - this is a simple booking job and pays as one. After watching the atmosphere in the office (I had time, since they were awfully late), I was not even sure I wanted it: childish chatting and giggling, obvious excessive emphasis on how people look, awful music and dirty working space... it looked like a private living room rather than a professional working space. Better off without that job!