Screening round followed by the technical coding round.
The initial HR screening round was smooth and professional, followed by a technical coding round with the panel. However, the overall experience in the second round was disappointing. The interview panel was unprofessional in their approach, frequently laughing at responses and making the candidate feel uncomfortable. The interaction lacked basic courtesy and respect expected in a professional interview setting. Most questions were scenario-based with a coding problem, but the overall conduct of the panel made it a negative experience. I did not find the process aligned with a fair or respectful interview environment.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Scenario-based questions on java, springboot, microservices, design application base code snippet.
J'ai passé un entretien chez UST (Thiruvananthapuram)
Entretien
The interview was conducted online. During the technical discussion, the interviewer repeatedly implied that I might be looking up answers elsewhere, despite me responding based on my own experience and project knowledge. This made the conversation uncomfortable and felt disrespectful. Instead of clarifying doubts constructively, assumptions were made about my honesty
they have three round.two technical one hr..they asked more about springboot micreoservice and java core...
they have three round.two technical one hr..they asked more about springboot micreoservice and java core...