J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 1 semaine. J'ai passé un entretien chez Trimble (Washington, DC) en févr. 2011
Entretien
It was a quick process. There were a team of 6 or seven techies were there in the interview and asked lots of standard C# questions and some hands on the board. It was pretty interesting interview. They made a quick decision within a week.It was pretty standard interview process with some unconventional/nontechnical questions at the end along with puzzles. they made me feel comfortable during the whole process even though there were too many folks at the interview table which may be frightening initially for those with little/no experience in attending interviews.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
There were some puzzles at the end of the interview which was quite unexpected. Apart from that rest of them are pretty standard.
J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 2 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Trimble (Chennai) en mai 2024
Entretien
Not good, interviewers are not that knowledgable. Asking a lot of bookish questions, not much logical. A person good at mugging up can crack it easily. Were not that approchable, would have liked if they were a bit approchable.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Basic Questions on coding , but not logical, mostly bookish
Good interview over all and it was a nice experience altogether. Initial telephonic screening and followed by in person technical interview. Got rejected in second technical round. Over all good experience
J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 4 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Trimble en févr. 2023
Entretien
Had a recruiter phone screen then online Hackerank assessment. You have to pass the online screen before even talking to an hiring management which I didn't think was fair. The test in my opinion wasn't reflective of duties highlighted in the job description. It was like being tested for 3 roles in 1.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Questions ranged from development to testing to deployment. They were not indicative of actual role responsibilities and I thought it was very misleading. I didn't pass the test because it literally was testing stuff I wouldn't be responsible for and wasn't prepared to answer. I'd applied to this company in the past and they disappointed yet again so I'll definitely never consider them in the future.