1. screening interview with HR 2. home task - it consisted of 2 parts: a. a few algorithm exercises via hackerrank b. implementing a UI based on a provided mockup in figma i only received feedback on one part of the home task, nothing about the hackerrank exercises. the feedback about the figma project implementation was very strange: i used a 3rd-party library to validate numbers. to the reviewer this was a negative point. in reality, good engineers use battle tested libraries for such tasks, instead of hacking a custom solution, which is guaranteed to be buggy and miss edge cases. i took a shortcut of using two font types instead of the 3 (IIRC) provided. in the description i explained why i took this shortcut and why it wouldn't matter in a real project. to the reviewer, this was taken as a negative point. i added extensive tests but this was not taken as a positive. the reviewer mentioned my tests were "basic", without explaining why they thought so. responsive design was rated as "okay" without further explanation. in my opinion, i implemented the mobile UI exactly as in the mock.