J'ai postulé en ligne. J'ai passé un entretien chez Rokt
Entretien
Being good at solving logical puzzles can only mean one thing: You are good at solving logical puzzles. They are not an indication of how good you are at software engineering, since they are an entirely different skillset that needs to be practiced separately. Similarly, being good at math means you are good at math. Therefore, an assessment requiring skill in these is useless, and goes to show that they, alongside similar toxic companies, don't respect a candidate's time. Ironically, the entire process weeds out good candidates who aren't willing to put up with this.
Terrible, they gave me this take home project and then gave me no interview and no feedback on why I was rejected, even when asked. They just left my email on read and ignored me.
The interview consists of a few stages. First they have workplace and aptitude test then there is a solo recorded interview followed by several coding interviews and a bar raiser interview.
Standard IQ testing + 2min video about project I'd completed, then zoom code interview, then system architecture interview, then finally a fit interview. Early interview section was fairly easy, System design was a pretty reasonable 2 stage login/verification app, fit interview was quite engaging and in depth.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
System design was a pretty reasonable 2 stage login/verification app - was asked first to design a scraper to import logins from a text doc on s3 to a db. then infrastructure on how to get logins within 100ms from front to back.