Interview process is very long unnecessarily. You are made to feel like a cog in the wheel and every candidate goes through the same process and same case studies with no detailed feedback provided at any stage of the process. I was rejected at the skills interview stage and there was no feedback provided as to why I was rejected, even though the interview went well and the interviewer explicitly referenced the next stage. Generic rejection email sent and was ghosted when I asked for further feedback. Not very useful from a development perspective.

1. Screening interview 2. CCAT (maths/verbal/shape test) 3. Technical interview about Financial Crime and how a hypothetical Revolut process could be improved 4. Problem solving interview - get given a hypothetical case study example - you need to ask questions to get to the 'root cause of the problem' and then present back 3-5 solutions. I didn't get past the 4th stage, and when I asked for feedback I got told they don't do detailed feedback and maybe next time! A very disappointing end to what was a good recruitment process. I don't get how the company feel it's fair to not give feedback to candidates after 2 interviews.

Initial screening call with recruiter who went over position details and my work experience. The interview duration was 30 minutes. After screening, was required to do an aptitude test which was not related to the job function. This test was a waste of time since someone who has been in the workforce for more than 20 years would not remember SAT type questions. I have more experience in the Financial crimes space than their Directors and it’s unfortunate that they will not consider the experience.