Aller au contenuAller au pied de page
  • Emplois
  • Entreprises
  • Salaires
  • Pour les employeurs

      Boostez votre carrière

      Découvrez votre salaire potentiel, décrochez des emplois de rêve et partagez vos témoignages de manière anonyme.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Qualtrics

      Employeur impliqué

      À propos
      Avis
      Salaires et avantages
      Emplois
      Entretiens
      Entretiens
      Recherches associées: Avis sur Qualtrics | Offres d’emploi chez Qualtrics | Salaires chez Qualtrics | Avantages sociaux chez Qualtrics
      Entretiens chez QualtricsEntretiens d’embauche pour Software Engineer - Engineering Services chez QualtricsEntretien chez Qualtrics


      Glassdoor

      • À propos
      • Récompenses
      • Blog
      • Nous contacter
      • Guides

      Employeurs

      • Compte employeur gratuit
      • Centre employeur
      • Blog pour les employeurs

      Informations

      • Aide
      • Règles de la communauté
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Confidentialité et choix publicitaires
      • Ne pas vendre ni partager mes informations
      • Outil de consentement aux cookies

      Travailler avec nous

      • Annonceurs
      • Carrières
      Télécharger l'application

      • Parcourir par :
      • Entreprises
      • Emplois
      • Lieux

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. « Glassdoor », son logo, « Worklife Pro » et « Bowls » sont des marques déposées de Glassdoor LLC.

      Entreprises suivies

      Tenez-vous au courant des dernières opportunités et profitez de conseils d’initiés en suivant les entreprises de vos rêves.

      Recherche d’emplois

      Obtenez des recommandations et des mises à jour personnalisées en démarrant vos recherches.

      Entretien pour Software Engineer - Engineering Services

      22 déc. 2016
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Provo, UT
      Aucune offre
      Expérience neutre
      Entretien difficile

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé via un recruteur. Le processus a pris 3 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Qualtrics (Provo, UT) en déc. 2016

      Entretien

      I was contacted by a Qualtrics recruiter about the position. I hesitantly responded which initiated a 15 minute phone call with him to discuss the position and my qualifications. A phone screening was then scheduled which started with a brief discussion about my interest in the position and my experience level. This was followed by coding on a shared screen (collabedit) which took the majority of the time remaining in the 45 minute call. Afterwards I was invited to the Provo office for an on-site interview. This consisted of 4 one hour long interviews. The first was a positive cultural fit interview, and was with a manager on the team. The second was with a lead engineer and was primarily whiteboard coding. This individual seemed a little adversarial, and asked "I'm just curious, what did they teach in school back then?" referring to my college experience in 1996-2001 (I'm 39 years old). The third interview was with a manager of an operations team. This individual did well but asked many questions about infrastructure architecture, which didn't feel relevant to the position I was applying for. The final interview was with a director remotely using Collabedit again. The office has a good energy and many of the employees seem actively engaged. Several dogs are in the office though, which isn't the best for someone with allergies. I received a phone call 5 days later from the original recruiter that based on interview feedback they were choosing to move forward with other candidates.

      Questions d'entretien [2]

      Question 1

      Given a string which contains 8 coordinates that represent 2 rectangles, write code to find how many times the first rectangle can fit inside the overlapping areas of the rectangles without overlap.
      Répondre à cette question

      Question 2

      Given a sequence of numbers, find the sub-sequence with the highest sum. What is the Big O for the solution?
      Répondre à cette question