First round: given a folder of csvs on airports/airplane how to extract info from a question (e.g. what percentage of flights are flying from point a to point b) Second round: coding interview on string manipulation that is similar to html format e.g. Third round: design a door access system to get into office buildings… the interviewer was really argumentative in a way that felt like this system design was NOT open ended. The interviewer was looking for a very specific answer.

technical interviews were fine - they have a WHO interview which is hard to gauge what they are looking for and very subjective and up to the interpretation of the interviewer. I came from a not so privileged background which seemed to attract a lot of quistions in this interview

Like others are reporting, the 1st round was similar CSVs with data around flights/airports/tickets/passengers. Questions were almost too basic, pure statistics, overview, light data manipulation (used pandas in a jupyter notebook). The most difficult question involved identifying that a discounted executive class ticket could (in some cases) cost less than an economy ticket... The goal seemed to be to identify a particularity in the dataset with business impact, in this case the inconsistency in ticket categories with impact in branding/reputation - without really needing to isolate other variables that could make the overlap a natural consequence like flight distance etc. I passed to next stage. A colleague of mine was interviewed a few days before with a slight variant dataset, but the last question was WAY more difficult, requiring a complicated self-join etc etc. He failed.