Online-Meet followed by an on-sight session of a few hours. Some classic cases, some more practical ones. On site experience is quite good with a seemingly fair process - challenging enough to not be boring and easy enough to not be overwhelming. Criteria after which they are after in the various cases is kind of unclear though and would certainly help in answering the cases better. First interview came in relatively quick. The time to the second was already a few weeks, and finally the feedback after the final sessions was promised within a few days. I've asked about the current state a few time, never got a reply until finally about 2 or 3 weeks later a rejection. Might actually have been a cool job, but the interview experience overall was overshadowed by not holding up commitments and lacking decent communication practices.