The interview was conversational and dynamic, with the interviewer actively listening to each response. They asked standard questions initially, covering experience, skills, and motivations, but went beyond by posing follow-up questions tailored to each answer. This back-and-forth created an in-depth discussion, allowing the interviewer to better understand my perspectives, problem-solving abilities, and past experiences. The responsive approach made the interview feel less formal and more like a thoughtful dialogue, helping me convey a fuller picture of my qualifications and personality. Overall, the interview atmosphere was professional, supportive, and insightful.

This was followed by an online technical assessment testing core engineering fundamentals. After passing the assessment, I had [1-2] technical interview rounds with senior engineers. These rounds were deep dives into transistor-level behaviors, layout optimization, and firmware troubleshooting. The interviewers really wanted to see my problem-solving approach rather than just hearing the correct final answer. The final stage was a behavioral panel with cross-functional managers, utilizing the STAR method to gauge how I handle tight lab deadlines, high-pressure environments, and team collaboration.