J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 4 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Kittyhawk en août 2018
Entretien
Had 2 phone interviews, one with team lead and one with an engineer. They asked various technical questions.
On-site interview consisted of a presentation that 5 people attended and some Q&A. Then 3 one-on-one interviews that went deeper into technical details.
Everyone was friendly, however, I felt like they were asking me questions on how I performed my current job to learn about the industry standards/methods. A lot of it didn't seem to test my knowledge.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
What are the various ways to organize requirements? For example, the navigation system requirements.
J'ai postulé via une autre source. Le processus a pris 2 jours. J'ai passé un entretien chez Kittyhawk (San Jose, CA)
Entretien
It was a phone interview, call was on time luckily. Sadly, that's about where the good times end. Interview consisted of asking seemingly basic technical knowledge questions, answering them, and then being told that's "close" or "not quite it". This then was followed by a longer 4 or 5 sentence explaining exactly what they are talking about, usually being what I had said but with different wording. Repeat that frustrating experience 3 to 4 times and you have the full interview.
I think the interviewer was an alright person, but she didn't quite understand everything being said to her. She even said I claimed knowledge of a particular skill which isn't listed anywhere on my resume and was software I had never even touched before. It was like talking past each other. If this interview is indicative of their company, then it's riddled with repeating the same task over and over because its not done "exactly" how they'd like it.
0/10 wouldn't apply again.