The decision process was long but it was a good experience and the interviewers were quite experienced. They were very open to feedback and were very open to discussion. It was a very good experience.

The interview was relatively straight forward and I was asked a set of standard questions. Although I was not able to go into much detail in my responses for the interviewer seemed to be in a rush. During the interview, he also said that the company had limited resources and in the role I would be expected to carry everything forward. (That as a PM can be expected, although I've never been asked this before and it did seem a little out of place). After the interview and checking the reviews on glass door some alarm bells were raised as to the negative feedback it has received (specifically since 2018). I raised this point with the recruiter who said she would look into it. The next day I got a short reply on this - in that its a big firm and there are reviews from around the around, but in the London office it's different. A day after this I was told that I had not been offered the role, but when I asked for feedback the recruiter said it's hard getting a response from the interviewer as he's so busy! I did not receive any feedback and considering I spent around a day preparing for the interview (which I had 2 days notice for) it felt a little disrespectful and unhelpful not even to provide some quick notes.