J'ai postulé via un recruteur. Le processus a pris 4 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Jet (Hoboken, NJ) en janv. 2018
Entretien
I reached out to a recruiter on Linkedin and we scheduled a phone call.
After the phone call (generic phone screen, checking my fit for the role based on my background, experience, etc) I was invited to download an app and play a game. This game basically tests memory, reflexes and logic/patterns.
After this round, I was invited on-site. Before my on-site, my recruiter called me to prep about the on-site.
During my on-site I met with 3 employees, 1-on-1. One was personality questions, one a UX design case study about the layout of a walmart.com page of a user shopping for batteries, and the last one was a more business case.
I felt they all went smooth. After there was a panel where at least 10 candidates were packed in a tiny room and had the opportunity to ask 2 current category specialists candid questions. This part was sort of unorganised as we were way over the room's capacity, and the overall flow did not seem so organised. It was still nice of them to arrange this.
I received a rejection letter about 1.5 weeks later. It was from a no-reply sender and did was extremely generic (I imagine it was the same email they send to candidates that apply online and do not even make the first round). I found this rude and it would be more decent for the actual recruiter or someone else to reach out and even give some reason why I was not selected.
This is the reason I am rating my experience as negative. If a candidate puts in all this effort and advances to the final round, they could at least receive 1 line of feedback.
Initial phone screen followed by in person interview. The in person portion was three rounds of different types of questions. Mostly typical interview questions and one more creative portion where you redesigned a webpage.
I found it to be positive and helpful. I learned a lot about the role and the culture. There were multiple rounds and I got to meet with several managers. I would recommend the role/interview process to my peers.
Seamless but challenging. The questions are geared to make you think critically while the answers are not necessarily the end goal. The more research you do the better. Good people