The 1st interview with TA was straightforward, structured, and good. The 2nd round started with regular questions about past experiences followed by a live test. I have very strong signals that the HM had made mistakes in their own responses to the test. Those mistakes showed up as they built upon the initial question, and are: "corrected" my formula by telling me not to multiply a monthly metric by 3 to answer a quarter-based question; told me to simplify the response by not plotting a distribution for staggered incremental revenue and proceed with 100% rev back-to-back; challenged my thought process when I cut out a step for a 1:1 count-to-$ relationship. In the rejection email they mentioned an "impression of uncertainty and inconsistency in communication under pressure" which I found ironic.

Tolles Team. Sehr angenehme Art und Weise Interviews zu führen. Es wurde viel Rücksicht auf ein gemeinsam gutes und positives Erlebnis gelegt. Ich kann diese Art und Weise des Hirings nur loben.