The interview process is as usual intro to experience. What the most important fact is that the interview is about value system that matches with their values. Experience and skills go in vain. Feedback is also not communicated in a constructive way. The interview was totally biased. If they were looking for values, then they could have ask candidates in that way.

Had 3 rounds. 1. HR Screening - Background, availability and setting expectations. 2. Technical Interview - The interviewer was really professional and polite. The interview itself wasn't very difficult as they explored themes around SQL, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable, R2R, P2P, O2C. 3. Director Interview - Again not too difficult but the interviewer wasn't interested, he barely looked at the screen and was slightly unprofessional. He asked vague questions and ended the interview abruptly in a shorter time than was scheduled. ***Overall experience*** - It looked as though they had already selected a candidate and were just interviewing the rest of the candidates for the sake of it. Basically just going through the motions. The HR also abruptly sent a rejection which I thought was quite unprofessional.