The overall process was quite smooth and well-structured, with clear stages and minimal technical or procedural difficulties. However, there appeared to be certain inconsistencies in the selection process, which at times felt somewhat biased. The evaluation did not always seem entirely merit-driven, as external factors appeared to influence outcomes. In particular, the college or institutional affiliation of candidates seemed to play a noticeable role in decision-making, potentially overshadowing individual skills and performance. This created a perception that, despite a streamlined process, the selection criteria were not uniformly applied across all candidates, raising concerns about fairness and transparency.