Aller au contenuAller au pied de page
  • Emplois
  • Entreprises
  • Salaires
  • Pour les employeurs

      Boostez votre carrière

      Découvrez votre salaire potentiel, décrochez des emplois de rêve et partagez vos témoignages de manière anonyme.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Goodlord

      Employeur impliqué

      À propos
      Avis
      Salaires et avantages
      Emplois
      Entretiens
      Entretiens
      Recherches associées: Avis sur Goodlord | Offres d’emploi chez Goodlord | Salaires chez Goodlord | Avantages sociaux chez Goodlord
      Entretiens chez GoodlordEntretiens d’embauche pour Business System Analyst chez GoodlordEntretien chez Goodlord


      Glassdoor

      • À propos
      • Récompenses
      • Blog
      • Nous contacter
      • Guides

      Employeurs

      • Compte employeur gratuit
      • Centre employeur
      • Blog pour les employeurs

      Informations

      • Aide
      • Règles de la communauté
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Confidentialité et choix publicitaires
      • Ne pas vendre ni partager mes informations
      • Outil de consentement aux cookies

      Travailler avec nous

      • Annonceurs
      • Carrières
      Télécharger l'application

      • Parcourir par :
      • Entreprises
      • Emplois
      • Lieux

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. « Glassdoor », son logo, « Worklife Pro » et « Bowls » sont des marques déposées de Glassdoor LLC.

      Entreprises suivies

      Tenez-vous au courant des dernières opportunités et profitez de conseils d’initiés en suivant les entreprises de vos rêves.

      Recherche d’emplois

      Obtenez des recommandations et des mises à jour personnalisées en démarrant vos recherches.

      Entretien pour Business System Analyst

      2 févr. 2026
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Londres, Angleterre
      Aucune offre
      Expérience négative
      Entretien difficile

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé en ligne. J'ai passé un entretien chez Goodlord (Londres, Angleterre) en janv. 2026

      Entretien

      Warning: Excessive technical demands & misaligned assessment process. Please read this before deciding if it is wise to invest your time in this interview pattern. The Process: Step 1: 45-min Initial Video Call: With the Business Systems Lead and/or CTO. (Note: A CTO being present this early for a non-executive role is unusual in the UK market). Step 2: Hands-on Exercise: Advertised as "3-4 hours" to complete. In reality, this required at least 20 hours of effort to map requirements from raw business cases, design the solution, develop, and document. It was capped at 2 days (received Friday, due Sunday), meaning I spent my entire weekend catching the deadline. Warning: The business case was highly aligned with their actual UK operations. You run the risk of providing "free consulting" or candidate extraction based on the problems they are currently trying to solve. Step 3: 90-min Technical Session: Live coding/modifying your solution with the CTO. You must be ready to screen share and make changes on the fly. This felt like a red flag: If you require a 20-hour take-home assessment, why verify the same technical skills again in a high-pressure live setting? It felt like an excessive system designed to fail people by asking you to prove the same dimension twice in two high-effort ways. Step 4: 45-min Values Session: This felt performative. It is the most likely place to get rejected based on assumptions by people who don't know the area or the hiring manager's needs. It felt similar to the toxic culture at Amazon (e.g., their Leadership Principles). The Outcome & Misalignment: The hiring lead provided feedback that they loved my technical execution, specifically my scalable design, queue logic, and documentation. However, I was rejected for a "gap in Business Analysis and Stakeholder Management." Why this is unreasonable: Disconnected Assessment: The rejection cited gaps in stakeholder management, yet there were no stakeholder scenarios, requirement-gathering exercises, or behavioral questions designed to evaluate this. My day-to-day role involves significant business-facing work, and I’m formally trained in this space (including Business Analysis and PSM certifications). I’m comfortable being assessed on these skills, but in this process, there was zero opportunity to demonstrate them. The decision was made on inference rather than observation. Misleading Scope: The case was a delivery-level task (Requirement + Build + Document) requiring 20+ hours, not the advertised 3-4. As a Systems Lead or CTO, you would know that if you asked your team to deliver this scope in two days, it would be pushed back as it is easily a full Sprint's worth of effort. Conclusion: I am open to rejection; however, I have recently secured final interviews with several prestigious global companies and well-established UK businesses. None of them were this excessive, misaligned, or demanding. This process asks for massive upfront effort from the candidate but fails to test the very skills they use to make the final decision. While I appreciate the HR team was supportive and friendly, it doesn't change the toxic interview setup.

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      Step 1: 45-min Initial Video Call Step 2: Hands-on Exercise Step 3: 90-min Technical Session Step 4: 45-min Values Session
      Répondre à cette question
      avatar
      Réponse de Goodlord
      3mo
      Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. We’re sorry to hear that the process didn’t land in the way you’d hoped, but we do genuinely appreciate the time and effort you invested. At Goodlord, we aim for a transparent, 'no surprises' recruitment process. We brief every candidate on the stages, the seniority of the team involved, and the expected time commitment so they can make an informed decision about whether to move forward. Regarding the technical exercise: this is based on a historical project and is used purely as an interview/assessment tool. We never use candidate work in our day-to-day operations. The task is designed to understand how a candidate prioritises information and communicates their thinking within a suggested 2-3 hour window. While we don't expect or require candidates to spend extended time beyond that, we do recognise and appreciate the level of effort you chose to invest. The live session is intentionally interactive and focused on business analysis and stakeholder communication, as these are core parts of working in a fast-moving scale-up environment. Similarly, our values interview is a fundamental part of how we hire, and is centred on behaviours and collaboration to ensure our environment is one where both the individual and the team can thrive. This is why you’ll often meet people from across the whole business, not just the immediate hiring team. We recognise that different interview styles suit different people, and that no single process will work for everyone. While this role wasn’t the right match on this occasion, we’re grateful for the time you put into the process and wish you every success in your next chapter. Best wishes Sam