Aller au contenuAller au pied de page
  • Emplois
  • Entreprises
  • Salaires
  • Pour les employeurs

      Boostez votre carrière

      Découvrez votre salaire potentiel, décrochez des emplois de rêve et partagez vos témoignages de manière anonyme.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Georgia Tech

      Est-ce votre entreprise ?

      À propos
      Avis
      Salaires et avantages
      Emplois
      Entretiens
      Entretiens
      Recherches associées: Avis sur Georgia Tech | Offres d’emploi chez Georgia Tech | Salaires chez Georgia Tech | Avantages sociaux chez Georgia Tech
      Entretiens chez Georgia TechEntretiens d’embauche pour Digital Project Specialist II chez Georgia TechEntretien chez Georgia Tech


      Glassdoor

      • À propos
      • Récompenses
      • Blog
      • Nous contacter
      • Guides

      Employeurs

      • Compte employeur gratuit
      • Centre employeur
      • Blog pour les employeurs

      Informations

      • Aide
      • Règles de la communauté
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Confidentialité et choix publicitaires
      • Ne pas vendre ni partager mes informations
      • Outil de consentement aux cookies

      Travailler avec nous

      • Annonceurs
      • Carrières
      Télécharger l'application

      • Parcourir par :
      • Entreprises
      • Emplois
      • Lieux

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. « Glassdoor », son logo, « Worklife Pro » et « Bowls » sont des marques déposées de Glassdoor LLC.

      Entreprises suivies

      Tenez-vous au courant des dernières opportunités et profitez de conseils d’initiés en suivant les entreprises de vos rêves.

      Recherche d’emplois

      Obtenez des recommandations et des mises à jour personnalisées en démarrant vos recherches.

      Entretien pour Digital Project Specialist II

      3 oct. 2024
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Aucune offre
      Expérience neutre
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 2 mois. J'ai passé un entretien chez Georgia Tech en sept. 2024

      Entretien

      I applied via the jobs portal and got the usual automated response. Almost a month later, I started receiving emails from HireVue, one of the popular self-recording websites, telling me that I was selected to complete a one-way video interview within several days. I also received an email from someone in GT Talent Acquisition that was a reminder to complete the video interview, which had the wrong due date (a date three months in the past, strangely). I completed the video interview and received an automated response thanking me and stating that someone from GT Talent Acquisition would be in touch if I was moved forward to the next round. That isn't what happened--instead, roughly another month passed (by this point, I assumed I didn't get the position), then I got an email not from Talent Acquisition, but from someone in the actual department hiring for the job, which had not been specified in the job description. The email stated that I was selected to move forward, then suggested a date two weeks in the future for a panel interview with actual people. This department's process took so long that I was able to complete an entire multi-interview process with a different employer, which resulted in an offer. My advice to this team is that there are numerous talented people seeking employment who don't have time to waste waiting around for unnecessarily extended processes. I was very interested in this position and I'm well aware that university hiring isn't always the quickest process, but if it takes an entire month to watch video recordings of potential candidates, why not schedule an actual live first interview to save everyone some time? No one likes one-way interviews, and it's additionally odd that HireVue doesn't seem to be universally used by Georgia Tech--so why is this department doing that?

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      I don't remember specifics but they weren't standard behavioral questions--they were at least somewhat tailored to the actual position advertised. They also weren't proofread and had a few typos.
      Répondre à cette question
      1