J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 2 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Everpure (Prague) en févr. 2023
Entretien
I applied through a company's job portal. I interviewed online at Pure Storage (Prague) on 23 Feb 2023. The online assessment was not very easy, it was medium-level questions. The after call four technical sessions were planned. My technical interview was separated 2 parts, the first 2 rounds and then 2 rounds else. In the first interview, an interviewer asked to write an algo lowercasing all dirs and sub-dirs names. The second interviewer asked questions about parallel tasking. I am waiting for the next 2 rounds.
So far had the coding test on HackerRank which was relatively easy. Two coding challenges and then 8 multiple-choice questions I think. The coding tasks are the leet-code level simple problems like counting objects in the input data etc.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Inferring information about the output of async tasks composed of atomic operations.
J'ai passé un entretien chez Everpure (California City, CA)
Entretien
It was the first round interview and was a Hacker rank with Easy-med leetcode qs including MCQs and fill in the blanks. 2 coding qs one was easy palindrome check.
J'ai postulé via une autre source. J'ai passé un entretien chez Everpure (Bengaluru) en août 2025
Entretien
Algorithm Round or Optical Illusion Puzzle?
Had an "interesting" experience with the so-called algorithm round. Still not sure if they were testing problem-solving skills or just hoping candidates would get lost in the formatting.
The highlight was a question on a bitbuddy tree (yep, that's what they called it) disguised in a 2D array format. Looked like a scene from Inception at first glance—layers within layers. Turns out, all it required was a plain old integer division. The challenge was more in deciphering what they were even asking, not solving the problem itself.
Would’ve appreciated a bit more clarity on what kind of "algorithm" knowledge they expect. Feels like they were going for clever, but ended up closer to cryptic.