Online contest, not very easy. The after call four technical sessions were planned. Proposed to do 2 sessions or 4 sessions per day. I decided to have two sessions. It was my first interview in such company (8 years in other company). With expected result... I remember now only technical part without soft skill checks. Technical part consists from medium complexity tasks. Some task was given which should be solved step by step with interviewer. Pretty interesting idea, but... It was my first interview on foreign language
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
The task was simple but the interviewer was not very friendly.
So far had the coding test on HackerRank which was relatively easy. Two coding challenges and then 8 multiple-choice questions I think. The coding tasks are the leet-code level simple problems like counting objects in the input data etc.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Inferring information about the output of async tasks composed of atomic operations.
J'ai passé un entretien chez Everpure (California City, CA)
Entretien
It was the first round interview and was a Hacker rank with Easy-med leetcode qs including MCQs and fill in the blanks. 2 coding qs one was easy palindrome check.
J'ai postulé via une autre source. J'ai passé un entretien chez Everpure (Bengaluru) en août 2025
Entretien
Algorithm Round or Optical Illusion Puzzle?
Had an "interesting" experience with the so-called algorithm round. Still not sure if they were testing problem-solving skills or just hoping candidates would get lost in the formatting.
The highlight was a question on a bitbuddy tree (yep, that's what they called it) disguised in a 2D array format. Looked like a scene from Inception at first glance—layers within layers. Turns out, all it required was a plain old integer division. The challenge was more in deciphering what they were even asking, not solving the problem itself.
Would’ve appreciated a bit more clarity on what kind of "algorithm" knowledge they expect. Feels like they were going for clever, but ended up closer to cryptic.