J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 2 mois. J'ai passé un entretien chez Epic en oct. 2017
Entretien
I submitted an application online and received a quick response to set up a phone screen. During the phone screen I spoke with an engineer who trailed off at the end of all of his questions and regular sentences so it was hard to tell when he was done talking, and when he asked me a question about OOP at the end of the call he forgot what the correct answer was and so was not sure if I was correct in my answer. Following this phone interview there was an immediate response to set up a test with ProcterU as well as a link to complete a personality test through rembrandtadvantage. As others have said the ProcterU test includes an IQ test, a section where you learn a new coding language, and a technical assessment. The rembrantadvantage test takes about an hour and the ProcterU test takes around 3 to 4 hours with the first thirty minutes being the IQ and learning a language section while the coding takes the majority of the time. That in total is five hours during which you are not speaking to an actual person from the company. In addition on the ProcterU test during the coding section you are not allowed to go to the bathroom at all which I found a bit absurd because of the length of it. It has been over two weeks since I took the technical assessment and I finally sent an email to the recruiter asking what my status was and it wasn't until sending that email that I finally got the rejection email. Overall I think this process reflects poorly on the company and I don't plan on applying to work with them again in the future.
J'ai passé un entretien chez Epic (San Francisco, CA)
Entretien
Medium level leetcode and then a very basic system design question as a final round interview. Overall, smooth and simple process. Only one technical and it was the first one.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
How would you design a system to minimize wait time at a health care center?
First round is a thirty minute phone call with one of their developers. The other part of the first round is a three hour exam with IQ test style logic questions and coding questions.
[OA] OA was fair. Programming part are leetcode easy and easy-mediums, straightforward simulation, backtracking, dfs, strings, etc. No DP/graphs but ymmv.
[Final interview] (Case Study) I think the interviewer came up with their own prompt. It's mostly discussion-based, with a virtual white board. It's not too technical. I'm guessing its testing your communication/logical reasoning than system design skills. (Pair programming) 1 question, same format as the OA on the same platform, leetcode easy.
[Overall] Technical difficulty isn't bad. Interviewers who are current software devs seemed friendly. Had a good experience, yet got rejected.