Looks like a great company, terrible experience with their recruiter. Two key things that weren't mentioned in the job description. First, the hiring manager is American and US-based. This can cause a big gap in mentality as the Israeli and American job interview culture is very different. Second, they put a big emphasis on their high pace with "daily releases". The experience was poor irrespective of the fact the role does not suit me. The recruiter called me post-interview. Rather than begin with the status - as is customary - she started with the feedback. This is wrong on two levels. One - a candidate is anxious to hear what his status is which is why you need to start out with the response rather than stress him out. Two - a candidate only has one thing on his mind with the status question unanswered. In that setting, he will not gain much from feedback. In a subsequent conversation, I mentioned this to the recruiter and got a defensive rebuttal about how I don't understand HR. The second thing is that while making her third point, I respectfully said that while I accept the majority of the feedback, I think that unfortunately due to the inherent limits of an interview (and possibly the culture difference), the recruiting manager got the wrong idea about the pace of the environment that I currently work in. I explained why I thought this was the case, why the limits of an interview came into play here and why I believe my specific case is an outlier which the interview proxy used misses out on. The astonishing response was that I don't need to take the feedback as reflecting upon my skills or my current workplace, that they did get a good impression of me, that I don't need to get defensive and lectured me how I might not know this but it's customary to give feedback and finally that if I were better, the manager would've gotten the right impression. In her eyes, disagreement is defensiveness, they're always flawless and feedback is a one way street. Poor.