R1: 30 mins screening call by Recruiter where they will ask about your tech stack and willingness to work on their tech stack R2: Home Assignment to write few APIs in express server using Sequalize Database Connector. The ask was to finish the task in 3 hours but overall time given was 48 hours. The feedback given back was not as per what was expected in the assignment for example, it was asked not to write lot of fancy stuffs but if time is there add few test cases but if you write, you have to write them well as it can become cons if you dont cover all the cases. The reviewer might have not looked into to expectations by himself properly i feel. Few cons which were written by reviewer was not even asked on provided in the code as well. I feel the interview process is fine, but they should properly train or give reviewers a process to follow. Else its all depends on your luck.

The interview process felt highly unprofessional and disengaged. The recruiter joined the meeting late for a morning interview and immediately mentioned being tired and exhausted before turning off the camera. The entire interview lasted around 8 minutes despite a scheduled 30-minute slot, including the time I spent asking my own questions. There was very little effort to understand my background or technical experience, and the interaction felt more like a checkbox exercise than a genuine evaluation process. The interviewer appeared uninterested throughout the conversation, which created the impression that the interview was being conducted only for process formalities rather than active hiring. As a candidate, I invest time preparing, researching the company, and attending interviews professionally. It’s reasonable to expect the same level of respect and engagement from the hiring side.