I recently underwent a grueling five-week interview process with Csg, involving five separate rounds. Despite the extensive time and effort invested, the experience was marred by unprofessionalism and a lack of transparency. Lack of Transparency: Throughout the process, I repeatedly inquired about the salary range for the position. The company evaded my questions, even during a call dedicated to discussing benefits. In the final interview with the VP , I was pressed to disclose my salary expectations without any indication of their compensation range. This evasiveness is concerning, especially considering the growing emphasis on pay transparency in many states. Unprofessional Conduct: After the final interview, I was led to believe that an offer was forthcoming. However, I was later informed that they would not be extending an offer. My request for feedback or a reason for this decision was met with silence. This lack of communication is not only unprofessional but also indicative of a disregard for candidates time and effort. Such behavior reflects poorly on the company’s recruitment process and overall respect for potential employees. Recommendation: Based on this experience, I would caution prospective candidates to be wary of their interview process. The combination of non-transparency regarding compensation and unprofessional handling of candidate communications suggests systemic issues within their hiring practices. Approach opportunities with this company with caution and ensure that you have clear expectations before investing significant time and energy.