J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 4 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Bloomberg (Londres, Angleterre) en oct. 2018
Entretien
The process of application was divided into following stages:
1. phone (CV screen)
2. technical interview (HackerRank, data structures)
3. on-site interview
They invited me to go to London after 2nd stage. However, 4 days before my trip (they forgot about time difference, so they called me at 5am!) they ask for one more interview <?>, which was planned 2 days before the planning trip (actually a little bit more than 1 day taking into consideration the flight departure).
The second interview (optimisation, algorithms) was pretty difficult and clearly just to eliminate a candidate.
Pretty rough, but still very unprofessional. On top of that, the following morning, I got mail if they can call me, I responded within 60 seconds that yes please call me, was waiting for their call for 30 mins, and eventually I got automatically generated message they my application is not processing any further. Without any feedback. Hard to plan your university deadlines/meetings/assignments with such organization.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Q: Cannot say, but about the graph and optimizing the flow.
15 minutes talking about resume, 45 minutes for 2 medium leetcode style coding questions (using code share), the interviewer was very friendly and communication is even more important than passing all test cases.
Overall, it was a positive and professional interview experience, though the interviewer was on the stricter side. Unfortunately, I was dealing with an illness and wasn't able to prepare as thoroughly as I wanted to, which left me feeling a bit off throughout the conversation. Despite not feeling my best and facing a tough interviewer, the process was well-structured.
J'ai passé un entretien chez Bloomberg (New York, NY)
Entretien
Fairly simple. Phone call then onsite. For onsite it was 10 min office tour follow by 1 hr interview then 1 hours system design and 30 mins manager interview. Interviewers were nice and the recruiter was accommodating.