J'ai postulé via un recruteur. J'ai passé un entretien chez Anthropic
Entretien
A recruiter reached out to me and after a good conversation setup a technical (coding) interview. When the code interview started, the first thing that struck me was that the task assigned had nothing to do with the role. Despite this, I successfully completed the task in the time allotted. However, I was sent an automated email that I was declined. It was obvious it was an automated email since it talked about "reapplying in the future" and "good luck on my current search"...except I didn't apply nor was I actively searching. The recruiter had reached out to me.
They sent me an automated CodeSignal test before I ever spoke to a human, which consisted of 4 stages of the same problem with each stage getting progressively more complex. Did not progress beyond this stage.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
They sent me an automated CodeSignal test before I ever spoke to a human, which consisted of 4 stages of the same problem with each stage getting progressively more complex. Did not progress beyond this stage.
The interview loop at Anthropic is completely different from the standard FAANG pipeline. They do not care about your ability to speed run algorithms. The entire process is built around "First Principles" thinking and writing extremely robust and safe code. After the recruiter screen, I had a deep dive pair programming session with an engineer. It felt much more like a collaborative work session than a test. They want to see how you handle edge cases and system failures in real time. I was asked to build a reliable message ingestion component that could handle streaming data with unpredictable latency spikes.
J'ai passé un entretien chez Anthropic (San Francisco, CA)
Entretien
Applied online, had an initial recruiter screen and a few technical rounds. Did not make it to onsite. Questions were pretty difficult and thoughtful, different than typical coding and system designs online.