Aller au contenuAller au pied de page
  • Emplois
  • Entreprises
  • Salaires
  • Pour les employeurs

      Boostez votre carrière

      Découvrez votre salaire potentiel, décrochez des emplois de rêve et partagez vos témoignages de manière anonyme.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Anaplan

      Employeur impliqué

      À propos
      Avis
      Salaires et avantages
      Emplois
      Entretiens
      Entretiens
      Recherches associées: Avis sur Anaplan | Offres d’emploi chez Anaplan | Salaires chez Anaplan | Avantages sociaux chez Anaplan
      Entretiens chez AnaplanEntretiens d’embauche pour Software Engineer chez AnaplanEntretien chez Anaplan


      Glassdoor

      • À propos
      • Récompenses
      • Blog
      • Nous contacter
      • Guides

      Employeurs

      • Compte employeur gratuit
      • Centre employeur
      • Blog pour les employeurs

      Informations

      • Aide
      • Règles de la communauté
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Confidentialité et choix publicitaires
      • Ne pas vendre ni partager mes informations
      • Outil de consentement aux cookies

      Travailler avec nous

      • Annonceurs
      • Carrières
      Télécharger l'application

      • Parcourir par :
      • Entreprises
      • Emplois
      • Lieux

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. « Glassdoor », son logo, « Worklife Pro » et « Bowls » sont des marques déposées de Glassdoor LLC.

      Entreprises suivies

      Tenez-vous au courant des dernières opportunités et profitez de conseils d’initiés en suivant les entreprises de vos rêves.

      Recherche d’emplois

      Obtenez des recommandations et des mises à jour personnalisées en démarrant vos recherches.

      Entretien pour Software Engineer

      13 sept. 2015
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Aucune offre
      Expérience négative
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé via un recruteur. Le processus a pris 1 semaine. J'ai passé un entretien chez Anaplan

      Entretien

      It started with a phone screen followed by 7 rounds of onsite interviews. Technical rounds were around 4. One concern I have about the interview is the rude interviewer. There was one guy, very young maybe is taking his first or second interview. He asked a question and was pushing very hard for time complexity. I asked for some time to compute it as it was recursive algorithm and I had to make recursive equation to solve it. He kept on growing impatient. I gave an answer and then he asked me if I memoize it, what would be the complexity. Without giving me a chance to think about it, or solve something on the board, he just wanted me to throw back an answer. Maybe he had crammed the question and answer before he came to the interview room, but not me. I was asked to answer in like 5 sec. Maybe the answer was wrong and he acted much more impatiently and advanced as though he wants to leave the room when just 15 min had gone by. So overall very disappointed with the behavior of interviewer, and there was no sign of respect. One of the senior engineers asked him to stop from leaving and sit and continue the conversation. Just after that interview I was so sure, whether I get an offer or not I can't work with this team (people). Overall I would say, there is energy at work, but people need to keep there attitude in check. When you are interviewing other candidates, remember that you are presenting your company to a person outside. All the staff in their office is very new and lacks professionalism.

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      Java fundamentals and basic algorithms. Nothing out of ordinary.
      Répondre à cette question
      9

      Autres retours d’entretien d’embauche pour un poste comme Software Engineer chez Anaplan

      Entretien pour Software Engineer

      13 mai 2026
      Employé (anonyme)
      Gurgaon, Haryana
      Offre acceptée
      Expérience positive
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé en personne. J'ai passé un entretien chez Anaplan (Gurgaon, Haryana)

      Entretien

      The interview loop at Anaplan was fairly direct. No extra rounds or overcomplication — just a clear sequence of discussions. Most interactions were centered around real situations and how you approach them, rather than trying to catch you off guard. The panel kept things concise and on track. There was a clear sense of what each round was trying to assess, which helped avoid any guesswork. Decisions were communicated without much lag, and the process didn’t lose momentum at any stage. Closed with an offer.

      Entretien pour Software Engineer

      17 mai 2026
      Employé (anonyme)
      Gurgaon, Haryana
      Offre acceptée
      Expérience positive
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé via la recommandation d'un employé. J'ai passé un entretien chez Anaplan (Gurgaon, Haryana) en avr. 2026

      Entretien

      Interviews conducted on a Saturday with lots of candidates showing up. Process well managed with candidates alloted separate time windows. 3 rounds of interview conducted with 2 technical rounds and one leadership.

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      They provide a piece of cake and asked to identify issues both logical and security problems.
      Répondre à cette question

      Entretien pour Software Engineer

      30 avr. 2026
      Employé (anonyme)
      Richmond, VA
      Offre acceptée
      Expérience positive
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 3 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Anaplan (Richmond, VA) en avr. 2026

      Entretien

      I had an initial phone interview with Stephanie Parker, who did a great job clearly outlining the role while also giving me space to walk through my experience and how it aligns. From there, I moved on to conversations with Michael Wilkinson and Tom Bull, which helped me build a deeper understanding of both the day-to-day work and the broader engineering culture at Anaplan. I appreciated how open those discussions were—it really felt like a two-way conversation where I could ask thoughtful questions and get honest insights. Finally, I had the opportunity to meet with Michael Stuart, VP of Engineering, which was a great way to round out the process and understand the bigger-picture vision. Overall, the entire process moved efficiently—taking about three weeks—and felt well-structured and respectful of my time. It was a genuinely positive experience that allowed both sides to get to know each other well. I also appreciated how quickly everything wrapped up, with a written offer following promptly after the verbal one.