First round with a recruiter, they passed due to lack of GTM experience. They looked for very specific product management experience for this role, which I found a bit strange due to the fact it was not a PM role.

1st interview with screener. High level questions around my experience as a PM. Moved to the 2nd round. Asked more detailed PM questions. At the end, my experience did not align to the gap they were trying to fill, so I got that immediate feedback. I really appreciated that because I have a couple of other roles that I applied and interviewed for and it has been weeks since I heard from them. I will say this was on of the best experiences I've had since I started my job hunt.

First interview with recruiter was short and easy. It's essentially a quick filter to the second interview, which went in depth to some very detailed questions that I've never had before at such depth. i.e. how many team members were in each scrum team at each company, please give the exact breakdown of the team members at each company, please tell me the exact release cadences of each company. Lots of questions about the company and less on my experience. Came off like they were looking for company intel for their sales team. Sketchy and a waste of time. Didn't get to the next round because they said I hadn't managed a large project budget so I wasn't qualified for the role. That's fine, but this was something they asked early on in and so why the need for all the detail on each company? Seems unethical.