great company but horrible CEO - Avis employé Manager Spring Health

1,0
23 déc. 2020
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Aside from the CEO the people here are generally nice and thoughtful people who came with good intentions. They joined the company because they care about mental health. Their passion for doing good while building something great shows.

Inconvénients

We had an all-hands meeting last week and these are the most upvoted questions people asked anonymously on slido for exec. 'There were a number of questions about cultre, intensity and fit from the 2020 year in review that have not been addressed. Should we expect them to be?' 'I know of at least 5 people who plan to leave Spring when April makes everyone return to the office after covid. Is there a contingency plan?' 'Any plan to improve glassdoor ratings (or improve company culture so ratings improve?) We've lost alot job candidates because the reviews are so bad (and true)' 'We consistently run out of time during this meeting and questions/concerns go unaddressed. worthwhile to set-up a separate company-wide Q&A call at some point?' These are not the kind of questions questions people ask when they are happy with their job. April the CEO makes everyone she works with miserable. It is hell here and most people who made the mistake of joining are trying to get out. Don't make the same mistake no matter what they tell you when they try to convince you to join the company. You will regret it for sure.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Spring Health

5,0
9 juin 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

I received payment on time.

Inconvénients

No cons. Just moved on.

3,0
17 juin 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

The company's products help people in meaningful ways

Inconvénients

Company is very poorly misled. There isn't a real vision or culture. In general, ways of working here are scattered and immature. We have a new SDLC every 10 months or so. Constant re-orgs and changes in leadership cause instability. Teams and ICs are re-allocated every 3–6 months. Priorities are constantly shifting. "Science will win" except when it comes to evaluating AI's place in our product. Sudden AI focus despite not having a real vision for how it aligns with our mission. Leaders who report directly to the CEO often cycle out every year or so. There seems to be very little awareness or ownership that leaders aren't set up for success. The company says it cares about employee "thriving" but promotes leaders with very poor scores. It seems to be more of a vanity metric/tool to fire people.

6
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout