employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Miller Environmental Group

Est-ce votre entreprise ?

Great place to work - Avis employé Salesman Miller Environmental Group

5,0
23 mars 2023
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Support from everyone in the company

Inconvénients

None at this given time

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Miller Environmental Group

5,0
7 mars 2025
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Some of the best people you will work with.

Inconvénients

Management is only out for money.

1,0
22 janv. 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

This is a joke right?

Inconvénients

Since its inception, the company has consistently demonstrated a failure to adhere to labor laws and ethical standards. The following areas outline the systemic issues encountered during my tenure: Wage and Benefit Discrepancies: There is a documented pattern of unauthorized payroll deductions labeled as "Miscellaneous" without prior disclosure. Furthermore, the company has failed to consistently remit employee 401(k) contributions and promised employer matches. Most critically, there are instances of gross underpayment for hours worked (e.g., 25 hours paid for 60 hours of labor), which constitutes a direct violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Negligent Hiring and Operational Instability: The company engages in predatory hiring practices, including recruiting via referrals for positions that are terminated shortly thereafter, suggesting a lack of fiscal planning or transparency regarding job security. Health and Safety Violations: Management maintains a negligent approach to workplace safety. Despite mandatory drug testing policies, there is documented evidence of employees utilizing synthetic urine to bypass screens. Management has knowingly allowed the active abuse of prescription medication on-site, creating a hazardous work environment. Contractual and Travel Misrepresentation: Employees are frequently sent on out-of-state assignments under false pretenses regarding duration (e.g., 2-week assignments extending to 5 months) and are subjected to restricted freedom of movement. Discriminatory Termination and Lack of Due Process: My recent termination was the result of a verbal altercation initiated by a colleague. Despite acting in self-defense, I was terminated without an investigation or explanation. This suggests a biased disciplinary process based on gender rather than a factual review of the incident.

1
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout