A Pathetic company, disappointing experience!!!! - Avis employé Lead Engineer Innodata

1,0
25 mars 2020
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Pros include:- Location, outside eateries, parking inside the building, DJ's on every festival/occasion

Inconvénients

I Worked in the organization for about 6 months, and believe me after 9 years of experience, 6 months are enough to access/understand an organization. My experience was very disappointing and I would highlight below points everyone should consider before joining:- 1.) This is prima facie not an IT company, it’s a KPO. What it means is that the company does not have an IT mindset. 2.) Managers follow micromanagement. 3.) It lacks good clients, so the funding is not that good. 4.) The infra is too bad means desktops, laptops with very poor configuration. 5.) Most of the projects does not follow any SDLC, most of the CR’s are done on the fly, the company lack and does not follow basic/best practices like documentation, there was no documentation for my project consisting 9 resources. This company is so cheap, that they have blocked (Lien Marked) my last month salary after crediting it into my account because I resigned(formally resigned because of the above facts) and they speculated that my intensions were not good. My EMI’s and my credit card bills bounced and I have been fined. It was like a harassment that I felt when I was in the company.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Innodata

5,0
2 févr. 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Great place to work with consistent communication.

Inconvénients

Days can get repetitive and dry

2,0
25 juin 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

The vast majority of the people I worked with on projects for a major internet company were friendly and educated. The pay was decent for trivial remote work.

Inconvénients

Projects were tedious at best and seemed poorly designed. Rubrics designed either by the contracting company or Innodata were often poorly thought through, and rules tripped over themselves or remained ambiguous. The company we were sub-contracted to was infamous for not replying to inquiries asking for clarification for how to evaluate the AI. Prompts given to the AI were often incoherent--just a word or name, often misspelled--which left us making arbitrary decisions about how well the AI addressed the prompt. Rubrics were hidden from employees evaluating the AI, though that seemed to be a result of neglect by a company still figuring out how to run things, not an active decision to deceive employees. I left well before the recent waves of layoffs. Management had tried to assure us that jobs were secure, but that seemed delusional given that the contracting company was farming out work through other companies rather than hire us itself.

Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout