Not a place you want to work - Avis employé Senior Software Engineer Infor

1,0
15 mai 2010
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Some of the best software engineers and architects i have met. Many of these have already left or might be leaving soon.

Inconvénients

Pretty old technologies being used. There is no concept of a career path at Infor. Titles are distributed randomly to people who have been just sticking to their jobs. Managers are very much micro-managing everything. Raises and performance reviews do not happen at all. Recent reorganisation has led to departure of lot of key people. Most of the development now involves just patching old applications which have been poorly designed in terms of architecture and scalability. Usage of very old technologies is failing to attract new people. The oldies who are manager just for the name of it are very conservative and do not want to experiment with new technology. This makes things quite depressing and frustrating.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Infor

5,0
27 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Good pay for area compared to other companies

Inconvénients

Some coworkers were low quality / low tier talent

avatar
Réponse de Infor
1w
Thank you for leaving a review. We strive to make Infor a great place to work for everyone, and to create an environment where employees can grow and thrive. We're happy to hear that your experience at Infor is a good one!
3,0
22 mai 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Inconvénients

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Réponse de Infor
1w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout