Avantages
As long as the reviewer of the review keeps calling everything "half truths", everything is great, right? Odd that the reviewer doesn't care to give credence to which "half" is true, since that would be admitting that the original review contained some accurate information. Perhaps this is the same jerk who finds it necessary to physically threaten people who disagree with him.
Inconvénients
Apparently the reviewer is more concerned about the quality of the food in the cafeteria than the insanity taking place in the workplace - instead of addressing that, food is being commended LOL. Other people working there have repeatedly complained to me that conversations aren't even allowed. But hey, I guess that's another "half-truth", right? After all, you're talking, so it can't be a full truth! Consider yourself part of the problem when you're not willing to address the actual complaints, nor admit what's going on, nor do something to fix the problems reported, which are nothing less than despicable.