Get in the door, and then get out as soon as you can. - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) Complex

2,0
1 nov. 2017
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

-Some people think the brand is cool. That means you might be cool too. -Fun and friendly office environment. -Strong reach for the content you'll make—gets your name out there. -Depending on your department and the day, you'll get some creative freedom. -Free beer on tap

Inconvénients

-You will be completely taken advantage of. -The Complex audience has devolved into dumb teenagers and #GamerGate trolls. -An overflow of branded content and sponsorship obligations has hurt the quality of the content and destroyed any remaining shred of editorial/journalistic integrity. -Management doesn't do anything to develop talent or improve themselves. -Daily/monthly traffic is the only thing that really matters. Management and other higher ups may say otherwise at times, but they're lying. -No moral compass. Again, traffic is king. -Everyone who works there knows "the culture" that Complex is supposedly advancing and trumpeting is superficial consumer-conning BS. -No overarching creative directive or company values to keep in mind while working. Where's the purpose? Just generate traffic and ad dollars. -You feel like you're *surviving* week-to-week. No long-term planning/projects/goals. -Not a meritocracy by any stretch of the imagination. -Very scrappy—and not in a good, fighting way—for such a large company. -Bizarre staffing and role definition—indicative of a company lacking clear direction. -Socially, the office is like high school at times. Like, WTF?

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Complex

5,0
8 juin 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Culture was exceptional and the company was filled with intelligent people

Inconvénients

There were not many cons

1,0
17 mai 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Complex had genuine brand equity and talented people throughout the organization. That makes it all the more frustrating to watch the company be run the way it is.

Inconvénients

Executive leadership operates on ego, tenure, and proximity to power rather than performance or accountability. There is no coherent business strategy, and more tellingly, no apparent interest in developing one. Decision-making is opinion-based at the top and the consequences flow downward. Appointments are made based on relationships rather than qualifications, including in roles that require deep technical expertise. Asking seasoned professionals to report into leadership with no relevant background isn't just a structural mistake, it's demoralizing to people who have spent careers building real expertise. Compensation and growth are effectively frozen. Annual reviews were canceled under the guise of budget constraints, which reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of what reviews are for. Performance conversations, goal-setting, and professional development are not line items; canceling them signals that the company has given up on investing in its people. The RTO policy is the clearest window into how leadership thinks about its workforce. The mandate exists with no meaningful connection to productivity, output, or business outcomes. The stated rationale, making the office look occupied, is not a strategy. Exceptions are applied inconsistently and without explanation. The net effect is a policy that reads as punitive toward exactly the kind of senior, expert, autonomous professionals a media-tech company should be fighting to retain. Layoffs have been handled with a level of callousness that is hard to overstate. The manner in which people have been let go reflects a broader indifference to the humans behind the headcount. If you are a high performer who values transparency, strategic clarity, and being treated like a professional adult, look carefully before accepting an offer here.

4
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout