Members Forgotten, Staff Silenced, Consultants Paid. - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) ASSP

1,0
17 avr. 2025
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

You can work remotely, good PTO.

Inconvénients

This used to be a great place to work, but over the past two years, it has become increasingly difficult. Leadership claims to promote openness and idea-sharing, yet any opinions that don’t align with the “chief’s” directives are quickly dismissed. Meetings are filled with empty corporate jargon, often punctuated by the CEO reminding everyone of her title and laughing at her own jokes. There’s a noticeable disparity in how staff are treated—favoritism is rampant, and hard-working employees are often sidelined while others are rewarded for blind loyalty. Entire departments of “yes men” have been built up to serve the CEO’s ego. Profit and corporate partnerships have clearly taken priority, while the organization’s mission and its members have fallen by the wayside. Committees were dissolved or downsized to make them easier to control. Meanwhile, employee benefits continue to shrink—even as money is spent on events at the CEO’s country club. The new CFO can’t seem to make a move without hiring a consulting firm—so be prepared to have your expertise sidelined while a group of overpaid old white guys come in to tell you things you already know, but with a slide deck.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur ASSP

5,0
1 mars 2022
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Provide free safety devices to companies & industries

Inconvénients

Not work, but learning volunteer experiences

2,0
25 avr. 2025
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Strong Benefits Package: Competitive and comprehensive, contributing positively to work-life balance. Supportive Colleagues: Many dedicated and passionate team members who are great to work with. Meaningful Mission: Working in support of workplace safety gives purpose and pride in the work being done.

Inconvénients

Lack of Open Dialogue: In recent years, there’s been a noticeable decline in the openness to certain staff ideas. Suggestions that differ from the prevailing view are often dismissed without discussion, making participation feel discouraged—even in meetings designed for collaboration. Disregard for Staff Feedback: Employee surveys and comments are not being utilized constructively, despite their intended purpose of improving organizational health. Return to Silos: After making progress toward collaborative teamwork, the organization has reverted to siloed decision-making. Subject-matter experts are often left out of relevant discussions. Devaluing Tenure: Long-term employees sometimes feel that their loyalty and institutional knowledge are no longer respected or valued. Lack of Inclusivity for Different Work Styles: Introverted team members or those with quieter approaches are often overlooked, rather than being recognized for their strengths and unique contributions. Overreliance on External Consultants: In situations where internal expertise exists, outside consultants are often brought in instead. This not only overlooks the knowledge and experience of current staff who have been close to the situation but can also bypass more thoughtful, inclusive internal processes.

4
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout