employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Premier Project Management

Est-ce votre entreprise ?

No Life - Avis employé Project Manager Premier Project Management

1,0
17 mars 2020
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Good team of people who can get the job done.

Inconvénients

Since COO knows nothing about construction schedules are dictated prior to full scope being known. Budgets and scope do not align but PM's are held responsible with no control over either. When things do not go the way COO thinks it should your bonus is threatened. PM's are told they have control of their projects yet have no authority when design is behind schedule but PM is responsible. Designers were always defended. More concerned about checklists, spreadsheets. PM's told who to invite and when PM's recommendation to award project to certain contractor is ignored and company that was awarded contract against PM's advice fails COO takes no responsibility for his decision. Time off is not respected

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Premier Project Management

5,0
30 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

The company has an incredible momentum and is growing fast. The new senior management has settled in and is providing stability that is needed. Communication has improved!

Inconvénients

Hospitality Industry is in a difficult situation and Ashford is selling hotels, which brings some uncertainty. However, it appears that that third party growth will make up for Ashford hotel reductions.

2,0
19 mars 2025
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Unique business model, comfortable office, & covered and secured parking. Nice standard issue of software provided. Great IT support provided. Project architects are not tasked with permitting.

Inconvénients

Inadequate fees for new projects, inadequate support staff, just a handful of experienced designers (excluding architecture design) with the others that lack basic industry skills, code, and construction knowledge who rely upon imagery to convey design that typically is half-baked. The company provides the very minimum computer accessories with most people buying their own keyboard, mouse, and cameras to perform their job. The current office consists of tall panel workstations that provide a sea of gray. People who stand at their desks are confined to inexpensive, small, manual desk risers instead of current workplace standards of power adjustable height work tables. There is an odd division between the design and architecture teams. HR is way understaffed with only one fulltime person. The yearly review process is a beating; takes far too much time. Nice cherry on top of the long hours cake. After working for almost a year, the company has yet to produce a full document of required procedures and architectural standards.

1
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout