Otis part of BIS (Carrier and Security) and moving operations to Florida - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) OTIS

1,0
24 janv. 2015
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

- Location (Farmington, CT) - Large parent company (UTC) - Great name tags - Friendly cafeteria staff - Week off from Christmas to New Years (this will soon be taken away, if it hasn't been already)

Inconvénients

- Top Heavy - Ethics communicated, but not followed - Nepotism/Favorites - Mgmt confusion (across board) - Minimal increases (2% pool) - False reality - Educational program, but advancement disconnect - ACE inconsistent - No loyalty - Dog eat dog mentality - Finds ingenious ways to take away every employee perk

Découvrez plus d’avis sur OTIS

5,0
12 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Real team work oriented. Feels very much being part of the company

Inconvénients

Needs juggling multiple jobs! A lot of travel involved. But great learning opportunities follow these.

1,0
6 juin 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Otis is a well-known company with a strong brand name, established customers, and exposure to major commercial accounts. The role gives you real responsibility quickly, especially if you are managing a service territory with active customer issues, contract renewals, and operational escalations. The experience can build strong skills in account management, customer retention, field coordination, problem solving, and handling high-pressure customer situations. You get direct exposure to customers, technicians, operations, and leadership, which can be valuable if you want to grow in service, sales, or facilities-related industries

Inconvénients

The biggest issue is poor management. The branch has serious operational problems, but leadership does not seem to have a clear plan to fix them. Instead, the pressure gets pushed down to the account manager, who ends up dealing with angry customers, unresolved service issues, delayed communication, and internal problems they do not fully control. Management needs to take more ownership of the environment they are putting employees into. New hires should not be expected to clean up long-standing territory issues without proper training, realistic timelines, and real support. There is a big difference between holding people accountable and blaming them for problems that were already there. The leadership style feels reactive instead of organized. Problems are addressed after they become urgent, communication is inconsistent, and expectations can feel disconnected from what is actually happening in the field. This creates unnecessary pressure on employees and makes it harder to rebuild trust with customers. The role would be much more manageable if management provided stronger onboarding, clearer priorities, better internal coordination, and more realistic expectations. Without that, employees can end up stuck between frustrated customers and a leadership team that does not provide enough support to actually solve the root issues.

Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout