NHS believes in promoting staff who display the core values and who show initiative - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) Merakey

5,0
9 mai 2013
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Competitive salaries, great benefit package, leadership development and advancement available, numerous support services available, and a high committment to compliance and integrity. The mission of NHS is to provide the highest quality of care to individuals in need. Staff who truly believe in this mission are extremely successful in building their career at NHS. Staff who work in direct care are capable of working their way up to corporate positions, if they have patience, determination, and very good work ethic.

Inconvénients

Large diverse company makes it difficult to communicate effectively. However, there are other opportunities for employees to obtain information and happenings around NHS by visiting their website or Facebook page.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Merakey

5,0
30 avr. 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Great Company and I love individuals we serve

Inconvénients

More exposure in job fairs and hiring events. getting our company name out there with more social media advertising

1,0
16 déc. 2025
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

The mission of the organization is meaningful, and hiring managers genuinely value quality candidates and strong placements. The work can be rewarding when the focus is on making thoughtful hires that truly support vulnerable individuals. Team members care deeply about doing the right thing and producing strong, long-term results.

Inconvénients

Under new management, recruiting has shifted to a numbers-driven model where metrics far outweigh quality, outcomes, and human impact. Recruiters are now responsible for interviewing and decision-making while simultaneously being held to significantly higher, rigid goals that do not account for location based candidate flow or program differences. Time is spent submitting phone screens and documenting nonviable candidates purely to satisfy metrics instead of actively sourcing strong applicants. Being discouraged from cherry-picking candidates, despite hiring for roles supporting vulnerable populations is concerning and demoralizing. This approach reduces efficiency, negatively impacts candidate experience, and has contributed to burnout and low morale. The system feels misaligned with the mission and set up for failure.

4
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout