employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

International Rescue Committee

Est-ce votre entreprise ?

Manager position - Avis employé Program Manager International Rescue Committee

2,0
24 janv. 2024
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

the team has a lot of enthusiastic and knowledge on the topic

Inconvénients

- HR is not involve and it is part of the conflict between staff and supervisor - They create position even when they don´t have budget - Don´t gave the full conditions to the staff and force them to achieve the outcomes of the project - they have supervisors that doesn´t have the full background for the position - the office depends from El Salvador, and they provide opportunities to the El Salvador staff for grow up in the company

Découvrez plus d’avis sur International Rescue Committee

5,0
12 mars 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Had a wonderful time interacting with the students and coworkers. Really appreciate the work of the IRC in supporting migrants.

Inconvénients

No Cons to speak of

2,0
22 avr. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Inconvénients

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout