Three years of my career wasted... - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) Infor

1,0
16 janv. 2014
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

- nice team spirit - friendly and approachable staff for the most part. - nice offices with a coffee shop onsite - remote working possible if you get a nice manager

Inconvénients

Ok, this could take a while... - no chance of promotion unless you're best friends with someone in management - no career reviews or pay reviews - nothing in three years and I don't know of anyone who got one in my time with them. - no training - continual interference in job by an ineffective HR team that seemed to know everything about nothing - lying from managers about career progression and salary opportunities - inability to hire the best talent due to paying 20% less than the main competitors - focused purely on making profit at the expense of everything else. - never even met my manager in the 3 years I worked there as the travel policy forbids anything that isn't chargeable to the client I could go on, but I would be here all day. This is a company that has so many problems at every level that I seriously wonder how they can ever hope to move forward. Maybe the long promised IPO will attract some other suckers and they can turn it around. But, seriously, this is a company where careers go to die...

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Infor

5,0
26 mars 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Not much volatility Work life balance Strong culture

Inconvénients

Big company, slow to change Heavy bureaucracy Nepotism

3,0
22 mai 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Inconvénients

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Réponse de Infor
3w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout