Humana has grown larger and quality of care and of communication needed for a good work environment has suffered. - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) Humana

2,0
22 janv. 2014
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Larger company can offer room for growth. Some good staff to work with, learn from and get to know.

Inconvénients

They are so big that communication within the company becomes difficult. The structure is set too big across the country. This leads to too much red tape, which waste time and to decisions being made by higher ups who do not fully understand all segments. That then leads to poor decision making. Benefits cost employees more than average in other health plans. The different health plans/companies acquired would be managed better if they were managed separately. They reassign acquired company functions to existing staff, who are unfamiliar with the plans. Naturally the staff is unable to produce 5 star work, because they are unprepared and overloaded with work. This is unfair to the employees and unfair to consumers. Everyone suffers. They only offer their own "Humana" health insurance to their employees, which is costly compared to other good commercial plans in the healthcare market. And, if you opt out, they force you to pay a penalty. Society would think that a health plan would be more considerate in this benefit, most of all. Humana is a private plan, so making a profit is priority, not the employee or the consumer.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Humana

5,0
7 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Awesome company with best industry standards

Inconvénients

Nothing I could notice , very good company

3,0
8 juil. 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Flexible shift schedule if you can maintain changing standards that have to be met to qualify; work at home remote and no phone calls for the screening RPhs

Inconvénients

This applies to all 4 pharmacy sites in Arizona, Texas, Ohio, and Florida: standards change constantly for what is accepted rate for production and missing errors (from MD office, tech entry, etc). Everything is about rate, rate, rate, yet you get majorly dinged for quality. Which of course we all want 100% perfect Rxs and no errors, but the rate continues to climb as RPhs practically just click the mouse to move an rx, taking safety shortcuts which are risky, and playing fast and loose with professional judgment allowances. These were not as allowed prior to Amazon, but once you have a company like that competing with you, patients expect everything in 24 hours and we're left to hang if we don't go faster and faster and stop worrying about what the MD actually wanted for example. You are penalized for questioning anything you think is wrong. Certain RPhs get picked to judge if your reasoning for clarifying is sound or not. Doctor leaves out directions frequency, just make it up, that's fine. No, that's prescribing and that's illegal. The Boards of Pharmacy and Medicine might want to look into this. I know one state did about 5 years ago due to an anonymous tip from a colleague.

Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout