Nuclear Engineer II - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) FirstEnergy

1,0
12 déc. 2016
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Decent power experience that help you in other industries.

Inconvénients

They will push you to try and sign off on projects that have the potential to harm the plant. A lot of people in management as far as supervisors and managers go in design are "yes men" and don't care at all about their employees. They'll throw you under the bus. They won't fire the corrupt and shady people due to limited loyalty so I'd stay away from this place. Everything is 30 years old including the office. They never clean so be prepared to get sick a lot, I never had allergies until I started working there. The plant goes down a lot so you'll have to give up your weekends and expect no bonus. The incentive bonus program is a sham as you never see it because the nuke sites are always shutting down for something. The pay is low. Morale is always low because they don't even provide the very basics to make any employee happy. Benefits aren't good.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur FirstEnergy

5,0
3 déc. 2025
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

FirstEnergy is a big company with a lot of growth that I've seen firsthand. Employees are helpful and all have the shared goals of keeping reliability of the electric grid. The pay is decent and stays competitive with the market rates as they do reviews consistently and evaluate. Its a great company that is trying to do better after misguided leads hip in the past

Inconvénients

Some executive leadership vision is not shared with lower level employees. The recent transition from WFH back to the office has left employees such as myself wondering why its not role based WFH.

1,0
2 juil. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Decent compensation and benefits package. Pay is generally competitive for the market, and the benefits are adequate.

Inconvénients

Leadership has fostered a culture of micromanagement and finger-pointing rather than collaboration and accountability. The company president has publicly conveyed a message that employees who are unhappy should simply leave, which reflects a concerning lack of interest in employee feedback and engagement. Employee satisfaction, work-life balance, and overall morale have noticeably declined over time. While financial performance appears strong, leadership seems more focused on satisfying investors and the board than addressing workplace culture and employee well-being.

2
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout