Can I give zero stars? - Avis employé Rater ETS

1,0
2 févr. 2018
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Working from home is a pro, but it is also a pro for the company since it reduces their overhead, yet they act like they're doing us a favor.

Inconvénients

ETS surreptitiously hired new raters at a lower pay rate, probably from the pool they had sitting around since they lost the SAT account, in order to feel free to cut the wages of current employees, with back-up raters waiting. Although they left Scoring Leaders' pay intact, they effectively increased their workload since it is logical that rater turnover will be much higher now and leaders will have to do more training and closer supervision of new hires. In this growing economy, a $15/hr job is not that hard to come by. Some of us may stick around for a while but rest assured we are all beginning to make other arrangements. And new raters will soon become disillusioned with the inconsistent hours, often cancelled or modified at the last minute, which we have been tolerating only because $18-20/hr wasn't a completely insulting pay rate.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur ETS

5,0
11 avr. 2025
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

It was a good experience.

Inconvénients

Nothing of note that was negative.

1,0
22 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Support of immediate management and coworkers makes coming to work every day a pleasure.

Inconvénients

Where to start... First, the employee performance evaluation process and methodology has changed from 1) performance vs your job description to 2) OKRs which were completely unattainable and meaningless at every level to 3) rocks and outcomes which again have very little to do with the day to day jobs of most employees. It seems the burden for goals and objectives and performance management has shifted from management to employees as they try to define a methodology that holds only doers responsible for the company's success. All this since Amit Sevak took over. Management manipulated the questions in a recent employee survey to force responses that made it look like there was improvement year over year. Of course, when you add a new President between the employees and the CEO peoples opinion of senior management is improved. Of course when you shift the focus to immediate management from senior management, the responses will be improved. Try issuing the exact same survey as the prior year and see how much "real" improvement there was in the numbers.

1
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout